Showing posts with label OnLive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OnLive. Show all posts

Wednesday, 8 April 2009

Wanted: In-Game Digital Advertising

I read an interesting forum string last night from the newly launched MAG: Massive Action Game teaser microsite, it was titled ‘Instead of PAY to PLAY, why not advertisements?’. MAG is an ambitious PlayStation 3 Massive Multiplayer Online (MMO) game that promises battles comprising of up to 256 online players simultaneously. As a result, speculation has arisen with regard to possible Pay-to-Play subscription charges arising. This thread demonstrates an avenue where adverts would be welcomed, even seen to be a positive solution to user needs. It seems adverts are not the victims of zipping when it comes to interactive media compared to television broadcast channels.

I for one would like to see in-game adverts for the added sense of integrated realism and sense of converged reality that they bring, as touched upon in my previous OnLive post. Should in-game advertising presence lead to free gaming where there otherwise would have been a fee, then all the more better for gamers. US gaming network IGN caught onto this innovative platform for advertising revenue back in 2005, setting up the world’s first In-game Advertising and Marketing service that saw much interest across the globally warm sea. Interesting how it was not a media agency that launched this premier service to the world... I think this is due to the medium of computer games still being looked at as more niche than other media forms despite the industry now being worth more than the Hollywood industry. But things will change; blogging was very niche once upon a decade ago and now look - blogging, mini blogging... blogging...

For brands this is an important digital channel to consider. Just as digital advertising has boomed in recent years, it took some time for brands and agencies to warm to the idea and recognise the power of digital over traditional forms of advertising such as broadcast and print – as a result they are now reaping the benefits of lower creation costs that generate wider spread share of mind and returns. I for one believe that having an in-game billboard with a brand on that players can attempt to Zap (did you Marketing bods see what I did there? Good times) with their virtual weapon of choice gives potentially the longest share of voice for said advertising brand. It is viral too – imagine a swarm of virtual billboard destruction seeking sheep flocking over to spray their ammo upon the victimised ambient, or in game messages to friends to “meet at the TheSugi sign” - it is an indirect brand referral! Well potentially anyhow... who knows, perhaps a good message may find its most suitable target audience via in game adverts, after all genres attract different consumers... just an idea.

So following on from my previous post on the potential for advertising and branding within computer games and interactive channels such as OnLive, what do you think? Would you like to see adverts in your games or will they nark you off something silly, and instigate a protest outside of Parliament?

Tuesday, 31 March 2009

Gaming and advertising OnLive


A few days ago I read about the unveiling of an innovation that combined two of my core passions; games and advertising communications. OnLive is a platform allowing for users to play full games via internet streaming through an OnLive box. It is truly a technological innovation that I believe will converge interactive entertainment (games) and interactive media communications (advertising and branding).

OnLive will potentially bring mass gaming to a new level of accessibility. No longer will we need to have a particular console or a beefed up PC that can calculate a weekend trip to the moon, no longer (hopefully) will we see endless “fan boy” banter trying to macho one another based upon 360 vs. PS3 vs. BMW... hopefully. Provided broadband technology can progress in time for the mass launch of OnLive, we may soon experience the epoch of connected, live and viable mass gaming free from hardware restrictions.

Technology has seeped into our lifestyles, and the internet has evolved from being perceived as a geeky niche to a core part of our daily lives. Sony successfully made computer games cool and socially acceptable building upon established innovations pioneered by Nintendo and Sega with the PlayStation brand; Mario and Sonic had gained guest list status towering that of Hollywood since. Similarly, Apple created the iPod that successfully provided the image conscious consumer with a product and brand that allows them to proudly carry a gadget without going covert and leading to wanting that PowerBook. Most recently, Sony PlayStation HOME brought a virtual social world to the mass casual, hardcore and web 2.0 gamer. HOME is a virtual world that was accessible by every PlayStation 3 owner, had more social credibility thanks to the Sony PlayStation brand than Fifth-Life, and allowed for brands such as Diesel to virtually peddle their branded wares. Could OnLive be what brings online gaming to the masses? It looks promising indeed.


I still remember playing WipEout 2097 on the PlayStation back in 1997 and noticing what I think is the first ever in game advertising of a real world brand in the game. Red Bull banners adorned tracks and I felt connected to the real world as I sped about in a blisteringly fast and unrealistic craft without wings. Good times. Since then, advertisers and brands have wised up to the potential of in game advertising, a favourite example of mine being in Ka (aka Mr. Mosquito in the western world) on the PlayStation 2, with household anti mosquito brands galore and more recently with Red Bull launching their own Red Bull Air Race PlayStation HOME space. Metal Gear Solid 4 saw our very own Solid Snake carrying around an in-game iPod to jam to as he sneaks about the place (the sticks work well to emulate iPod controls... take note Apple!).



My only concern is the likelihood of the gaming giants to support such an open channel, sacrificing what is quite obviously a viable business model of investing in a controllable market. I am of course referring to their own consoles. The PlayStation X, Nintendo Yuu/Mii/Wii, Xbox 1080p, all allow for control over market segments within the fastest growing entertainment market the world has ever seen. I hope that all can reach an agreeable meeting point that does not involve the loss of diverse choice to the consumers or the mass laying off of talented geniuses. Just think of the possibilities; Sony bringing their technological innovations in entertainment, Microsoft broadening their online LIVE services, and Nintendo contributing their blue-sky creativity. OnLive could also allow for Sony PlayStation HOME to reach a broader audience, in turn allowing brands with virtual presence such as Diesel to reach more gamers, via a socially accepted virtual space. Let's hope everyone can find a common ground to move this kind of technology forward.

The future is soon, and I believe in it.